Posting is reserved for Verified Users.  To become a Verified User, send an email to: expertaccess@ntvmr.uni-muenster.de
11 - Acts 16:11

Acts 16:11 (segment 2 - 4)

Threads [ Previous | Next ]
Acts 16:11 (segment 2 - 4)
Answer
31/01/18 12:22

Jump To ECM Entry      Online Commentary Introduction

GC: There is coherent majority attestation for a, and poor coherence in the b attestation.

TP: The consecutive conjunction may appear more appropriate because the action described in the new paragraph follows from the decision to go to Macedonia immediately. On the other hand, δέ may be seen to better reflect the departure to a new destination, but the lack of coherence in the b attestation tips the scales for a.[1]

 

[1]      The lack of coherence in the b attestation weakens Metzger’s statement that there was an inclination to replace δέ by οὖν (393). Barrett (777) seems to share Metzger’s view.

0 (0 Votes)