I noticed that 061 which is usually cited with Ω (i.e. ὃ, quod, etc.) has been transcribed with μυστηρ[ιον θσ] / ω εδικαι[ωθη]. Other than deductions from the space available and the length of the text attested, what is the basis for the restoration of θ(εο)ς in addition to ω?