Comments and Suggestions for Corrections


We welcome your feedback of any noticed deficiencies found in the printed NA28.  Please restrict these comments to typos, errors in the front and back matter, and in rendering the evidence in the apparatus.  Thank you for your feedback.

You will need "Expert User" access to leave comments below.  To request "Expert User" access, please send an email to:

Message Boards (NA28) Message Boards (NA28)


Lk 14:13 579

Lk 14:13 579
01/02/16 13:38
Currently the support for the reading δοχην ποιῃς includes 579. IGNTP Luke notes correctly that 579 reads ποιεις and that it is not alone in doing so (though it is alone in reading ποιεις in this word order). As the variant unit distinguishes between the two forms ποιησης and ποιης, it is probably better to include 579 in round brackets to avoid the conclusion that it supports the present subjunctive. I don't think there is a need to introduce the permutations with ποιεις in the apparatus though.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Lk 14:13 579
01/02/16 13:44 as a reply to Dirk Jongkind.
And the same is true for various witnesses given in support of ποιης δοχην.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Lk 14:13 579
03/05/16 11:47 as a reply to Dirk Jongkind.
This is a difficult situation--the point of the variation unit is to note the difference in word order, but there are indeed other instances in the apparatus where eta and epsilon differences are noted in subjunctives, e.g. Mk 13:7. This should be a situation for the editorial committee to discuss.  Thank you for your helpful comments--they are always welcomed!
+1 (1 Vote)

Wiki Wiki



0 Attachments
Average (0 Votes)
No comments yet. Be the first.