Comments and Suggestions for Corrections


We welcome your feedback of any noticed deficiencies found in the printed NA28.  Please restrict these comments to typos, errors in the front and back matter, and in rendering the evidence in the apparatus.  Thank you for your feedback.

You will need "Expert User" access to leave comments below.  To request "Expert User" access, please send an email to:

Message Boards (NA28) Message Boards (NA28)


Phil 2:26 in 2495

Phil 2:26 in 2495
17/06/21 11:57
In Phil 2:26 2495 is attesting παντας υμας ιδειν.

I am sure the reading of 2495 arose from that reading but the scribe (or a predecessor) omitted the first part of Phil 2:26 due to parablepsis:

... πέμψαι πρὸς ὑμᾶς, 26 ἐπειδὴ ἐπιποθῶν ἦν ⸂πάντας ὑμᾶς⸃ ιδειν καὶ ἀδημονῶν ...

Even if one would say that it is ὑμᾶς of 2:25 that is omitted and not ὑμᾶς of 2:26, the manuscript is not reading παντας.
Cf. lines 25-26 here:

Is the reason 2495 is attesting to παντας υμας ιδειν in the apparatus that it is considered the intended reading?
0 (0 Votes)

Wiki Wiki



0 Attachments
Average (0 Votes)
No comments yet. Be the first.