Posting is reserved for Verified Users.  To become a Verified User, send an email to: expertaccess@ntvmr.uni-muenster.de
ECM online

Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark)

Toggle
Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark) S Walch 12/20/23 9:51 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM - Mark 2:22 S Walch 12/18/23 11:46 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:44 S Walch 12/18/23 11:47 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:33 S Walch 12/18/23 11:48 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:21 S Walch 12/18/23 11:49 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 14:44 S Walch 12/18/23 11:51 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:13 S Walch 12/18/23 11:54 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 15:34 S Walch 2/24/24 12:45 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM marie-luise lakmann 12/19/23 11:01 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:8 S Walch 12/19/23 2:39 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:11 S Walch 12/19/23 3:34 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:15 S Walch 12/19/23 4:18 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:18 S Walch 12/19/23 8:02 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:23 S Walch 12/19/23 8:11 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:24 S Walch 12/19/23 9:09 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:19 S Walch 12/21/23 8:22 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:21 S Walch 12/20/23 5:11 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:25 S Walch 12/20/23 6:15 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:31 S Walch 12/25/23 9:45 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 5:23 S Walch 12/27/23 3:01 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:11/16 S Walch 12/29/23 2:50 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:20 S Walch 12/29/23 7:14 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:37 S Walch 12/30/23 12:11 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:38 S Walch 12/30/23 6:47 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:45 S Walch 12/30/23 7:00 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:5 S Walch 12/30/23 11:29 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:6 S Walch 12/30/23 11:45 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:8 S Walch 1/7/24 10:51 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:14 S Walch 12/31/23 12:08 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:19 S Walch 12/31/23 5:36 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:22 S Walch 12/31/23 5:50 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:23 S Walch 1/1/24 1:54 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:26 S Walch 1/1/24 2:17 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:36 S Walch 1/1/24 3:18 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:1 S Walch 1/1/24 6:35 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:3 S Walch 1/1/24 6:47 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:6 S Walch 1/1/24 7:06 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:16 S Walch 1/1/24 7:39 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:23 S Walch 1/3/24 6:37 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark) Manuscript Reader 1/3/24 1:37 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark) | Mark 8:28 S Walch 1/3/24 9:24 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:29 S Walch 1/4/24 6:48 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:4 S Walch 1/6/24 9:48 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:10 S Walch 1/6/24 10:12 AM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:22 S Walch 1/7/24 5:31 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:25 S Walch 1/7/24 5:33 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:39 S Walch 1/10/24 1:44 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:41 S Walch 1/9/24 7:33 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:42 S Walch 1/9/24 7:37 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:43 S Walch 1/9/24 7:41 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:50 S Walch 1/9/24 7:52 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 10:3 S Walch 1/10/24 8:21 PM
RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 10:12 S Walch 1/10/24 9:10 PM
Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark)
Answer
12/20/23 9:51 PM

Rather than posting a bunch of different threads for each time something in the ECM of Mark requires correction, I'm just going to put them all in this thread. :)

Newest correction:

Mark 2:23
14 (e) - Min. 983 incorrectly cited as 983r. when there's no reason for the r, as 983 reads πορευεσθαι like the other Fam. 13 mss.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM - Mark 2:22
Answer
12/18/23 11:46 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 2:22
D / 05 is incorrectly cited as supporting 48 (a) = ἀλλ’, whereas it has an entirely different reading here and doesn't include any of the words 48-58. Error also present in print ediiton, page 81.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:44
Answer
12/18/23 11:47 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 1:44
Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with variant 1:44, 10-14 (a) - μηδενι μηδεν ειπης - when it in fact agrees with the other Fam. 13 witnesses in reading (c), μηδενι ειπης. As seen on manuscript image (2nd column, line 17): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1150&fullPage=true

Transcription on INTF needs updating to reflect this.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:33
Answer
12/18/23 11:48 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 1:33
Min. 124 should be cited as reading τας θυρας along with the other witnesses in 16-18 (c), as demonstrated by the manuscript image (1st column, line 7) which reads:

πρὸς τὰς θύρας· καὶ ἐθε

https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1150&fullPage=true

Transcription on INTF also needs updating to reflect the above.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:21
Answer
12/18/23 11:49 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 1:21

Min. 124 is incorrectly cited as reading τοις σαβασιν εδιδασκεν εισελθων εις την συναγωγην εδιδασκεν, whereas the image shows it reads τοις σαβασιν εδιδασκεν εισελθων εις την συναγωγηνhttps://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1140&fullPage=true ; thus not repeating εδιδασκεν.

Transcription up on the NTVMR needs amending to reflect this.

Error present on ECM print edition page 24. Also has it included in the main bit above the critical apparatus as 14-26 (c). Essentially (c) doesn't exist and Min. 124 should be cited along with the other Fam. 13 witnesses under (l).

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 14:44
Answer
12/18/23 11:51 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 14:44
Segment 34 - Minuscule 4 is listed as under (e) αγαγετε, whereas both the transcription and image show it should be listed under (b) απαγετε  (Min. 4 has απαγεται). Print ECM also includes the error (page 722) - Line 19 / https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/community/modules/papyri/?site=VMR&image=30004/2020/10

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 1:13
Answer
12/18/23 11:54 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 1:13
Segment 12-14 - ECM cites Min. 1689 as reading επι in this verse (11c), when in fact it omits the entirety of καὶ ἦν ἐκεῖ ἐν τῇ ἐρήμῳ, as shown by both image and transcription, and obviously by the ECM itself (2-10e): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=31689&pageID=1180&fullPage=true. Error repeated in print edition on page 14.

Min. 1689 should also be cited as reading και τεσσαρακοντα νυκτας (15 bo).

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 15:34
Answer
2/24/24 12:45 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 15:34
Segment 24 - Lectionaries 770 and 773 are cited as having a spelling variant (r) after both (online edition has closed bracket ] before r after 773 when it should come after). A check of both places where the lectionaries repeat Mark 15:34 shows that Lect. 770 only spells it incorrectly in the second place (λειμα), but spells it correctly in the first place; lect. 773 doesn't have a spelling variant in either place. Confirmed by both INTF transcriptions and manuscript images.

Lect 770-1 Mark 15:34: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=40770&pageID=3890&fullPage=true / λιμα

Lect 770-2 Mark 15:34: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=40770&pageID=5380&fullPage=true / λειμα

Lect 773-1 Mark 15:34: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=40773&pageID=2770&fullPage=true / λιμα

Lect 773-2 Mark 15:34: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=40773&pageID=3880&fullPage=true / λιμα

Error present in print edition on page 801.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM
Answer
12/19/23 11:01 AM as a reply to S Walch.
Thanks for your notes! I have corrected the transcripts where necessary and we will update the digital ECM as soon as possible.
+1 (1 Vote)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:8
Answer
12/19/23 2:39 PM as a reply to marie-luise lakmann.

Thanks Marie :)

Mark 3:8
Segment 2-22 (a) - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited as 124r. here as transcription reads Ιδουμιας, whereas manuscript has no spelling mistake here and has the usual Ιδουμαιας. Transcription will require updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1190&fullPage=true

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:11
Answer
12/19/23 3:34 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 3:11
Segment 18-26 - Min. 124 is cited as supporting either (a) or (b), however this I think is due to the missreading of the manuscript where the transcription has λεγονται - the final α is as per the usual style for α at the end of a word, however there's a very small pause-dot at the bottom which looks like the copyist has written a final ι - how the copyist writes αι is more prominent - see for instance the final α before a dot on lines 7 / 17 / 23 / 24 in this same column in Min. 124. Min. 124 should be cited as supporting (a) only.

https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1190&fullPage=true

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:15
Answer
12/19/23 4:18 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 3:15
Segment 8-12 - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited as omitting θεραπευειν τας νοσους και (= (a) ) when it in fact includes the line as per other Fam. 13 witnesses in (b). Transcription on INTF unfortunately omits line 22: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1190&fullPage=true
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:18
Answer
12/19/23 8:02 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 3:18
Segment 17 - Min. 983 is incorrectly cited as reading και τελωνην (d), whereas it agrees with the others reading (b), τον τελωνην, as per the manuscript image. Transcription on INTF will also require updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30983&pageID=1230&fullPage=true

Error in print edition, page 108.

Min. 555 is also cited as reading τον τελωνων whereas it too also reads the usual τον τελωνην; the η just isn't written the best in the manuscript. Transcription on INTF also requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30555&pageID=1340&fullPage=true

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:23
Answer
12/19/23 8:11 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 3:23
Segment 24 - Min. 788 is cited as agreeing with ἐκβάλλειν, whereas the manuscript only has the one λ, hence agreeing with the other Fam. 13 witnesses in (b): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30788&pageID=1310&fullPage=true

Transcription on INTF requires updating. Error present in print edition, page 112.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 3:24
Answer
12/19/23 9:09 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 3:24
Segment 24 - Min. 855 is cited as supporting variant (f), but is then also included in the -- section as well. As it skips from σταθῆναι in v24 to καὶ εἰ ὁ Σατανᾶς at the beginning of v26, and some of the other witnesses cited in supporting variant (f) do the same jump (427. 732. 2106.), I'm presuming Min. 855 shouldn't be included in the -- section, or these other three witnesses should be included there as well :)
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:19
Answer
12/21/23 8:22 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 4:19
Segment 44-46 - Min. 124 is cited as supporting variants (a) or (b), however the manuscript only supports (b) with it reading γινονται and not γινεται as per the INTF transcription: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1220&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 145.

Edit: Seems Min. 427 and 1337 should be cited as only supporting (b) as well, as per the mss images (though 1337 is very faint, it is certainly an ι and not a σ/ς after the ο). Transcriptions of both will need updating. :)

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:21
Answer
12/20/23 5:11 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 4:21
Segment 36-44 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with variant (a) (ινα επι κτλ.) whereas it agrees with the other witnesses reading ἵνα ὑπὸ κτλ., variant (cf): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1230&fullPage=true. Transcription on INTF requires updating. Error present in print edition, page 148.

Min. 179 is cited as supporting either (a) or (c), but this is due to the transcription misreading υπο for υπι : https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30179&pageID=1600&fullPage=true . Should be cited under variant (cf).

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:25
Answer
12/20/23 6:15 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 4:25
Segment 41 - Min. 1689 is cited without r at the end; it agrees with the other Fam. 13 mss in reading μετριθήσεται for μετρηθήσεται so should also include the r afterwards. Error also in print edition, page 152.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 4:31
Answer
12/25/23 9:45 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 4:31
Segment 4 - Min. 117 is cited as 117r, whereas both transcription and image show no sort of spelling or other issue with the manuscript reading κοκκω. r can be removed. https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30117&pageID=1300&fullPage=true
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 5:23
Answer
12/27/23 3:01 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 5:23
Segment 30-34 - Min. 124 is cited as supporting either (a) or (m) (=τας χειρας αυτη / χειρα αυτη), however this is due to the transcription incorrectly reading επιθης χειρας αυτηι, where the image definitely shows it reads with the other fam. 13 members in reading επιθης χειρα αυτη(ι) (= (m)). Transcription will require updating (column 2, line 5): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1260&fullPage=true

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:11/16
Answer
12/29/23 2:50 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 6:11
Segment 47 - Min. 124 is cited as just reading αμην λεγω υμιν ανεκτοτερον εσται σοδομοις και γομορροις εν ημερα κρισεως, however this is due to the transcription jumping from η on line 24 to και in line 25, thus resulting in the column only having 25 as opposed to its 26 lines. Manuscript reads as majority text: αμην λεγω υμιν ανεκτοτερον εσται  σοδομοις και γομορροις εν ημερα κρισεως η τη(ι) πολει εκεινη(ι) (= (b) ).

Mark 6:16

Segment 18-22 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with (a), the omission of ἠγέρθη ἐκ νεκρῶν. This is due to the transcription unfortunately missing the correct line 19: στιν αυτος εκ νεκρον η. Min. 124 therefore reads the (as yet) unattested reading Ιωαννην ουτος εστιν αυτος εκ νεκρων ηγερθη, and would warrant it's own letter in the apparatus.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:20
Answer
12/29/23 7:14 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 6:20
Segment 40 - Min. 124 is separated from the other fam. 13 members (e) as apparently reading α ποιει , however manuscript reads as the other fam. 13 members: α εποιει. Transcription on INTF requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1300&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 15).

Similarly true for min. 826, which is cited as reading α ηπορει, however manuscript image shows it reads as the other fam. 13 members, α εποιει (it is most certainly an ι and not a ρ)https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30826&pageID=1470&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 6).

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:37
Answer
12/30/23 12:11 AM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 6:37
Segment 43-38/43 - Min. 124 isn't cited along with the other witnesses for (b) ινα εκαστος βραχυ λαβη, which is due to the transcription omitting the correct line 7, hence not including the correct reading: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1310&fullPage=true.

Should read (Column 1, lines 6-7):

6 μεν αυτοις φαγειν· ινα εκα
7 στος βραχυ λαβηι· ο δε

Min. 828 is cited as 828r for this same variant, though this appears to be due to a misreading of the manuscript which has εκαστος, and not as per the INTF transcription, εκατος (admittedly the σ is quite faint, but is definitely there). Transcription will require updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30828&pageID=1370&fullPage=true

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:38
Answer
12/30/23 6:47 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 6:38
Segment 25 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with the omission of αυτω (a), whereas the manuscript shows it agrees with the other fam. 13 witnesses and the other manuscripts which include it (b). Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1320&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 271.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 6:45
Answer
12/30/23 7:00 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 6:45
Segment 25 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with the witnesses omitting αυτον (a), whereas manuscript shows it agrees with the fam. 13 witnesses and the rest which include it (b). Transcription requires updating (Column 2, line 11): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1320&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 278.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:5
Answer
12/30/23 11:29 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 7:5
Segment 2 - Min .124 is cited as having (b), και επειτα, however manuscript shows it agrees with the other witnesses which just read επειτα (d). Transcription requires updating (Column 1, line 6): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1340&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 300.

Segment 48-52 - Uncials K (017) and Π (041) are cited as having (e) αρτον εσθιουσιν, whereas manuscript images and transcriptions show they actually have (d), εσθιουσιν αρτον. Error present in print edition, page 301.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:6
Answer
12/30/23 11:45 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 7:6
Segment 9 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with the witnesses omitting τι (a), whereas manuscript shows it agrees with those which include it (b). Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1340&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 302.

Segment 24-26 - Min. 124 is cited as having reading (b), ως γεγραπται οτι , whereas manuscript images shows it has reading (a), ως γεγραπται. Transcription needs updating (also ο should appear at the end of line 19, not beginning of line 20). Error present in print edition, page 303.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:8
Answer
1/7/24 10:51 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:8
Segment 21-9/21 - Min. 124 is cited as 124r. under (c), indicating some sort of difference with the text, but there's no spelling error present and 124. matches the text of (c) exactly, as shown by both manuscript image and INTF transcription. Error present in print edition, page 304.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:14
Answer
12/31/23 12:08 AM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:14
Segment 18-24 - Min. 124 is cited as having reading (bo), εμου παντες και συνιετε, however this appears to be due to the transcription accidentally repeating the ε at the end of ακουετε, whereas manuscript images shows there's no double ε, and min. 124 agrees with the other manuscripts reading (b) μου παντες και συνιετε. Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1340&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 312.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:19
Answer
12/31/23 5:36 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:19
Segment 16-23 - Min. 124 is cited as agreeing with (a), whereas manuscript shows it agrees with (ao), ἀλλὰ. Transcription requires updating (Column 1, line 21): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1350&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 317.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:22
Answer
12/31/23 5:50 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:22
Segment 10 - Min. 124 is incorrectly listed among the witnesses for (a), when it agrees with those under (ao), ασελγια. Transcription requires updating (Column 2, line 7): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1350&fullPage=true. Print edition, page 322.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:23
Answer
1/1/24 1:54 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:23
Segment 10-12 - Min. 1047 is cited as 1047r, but this is due to a misreading of υ as β in the transcription, hence doesn't require the r (compare the letters with εισπορευομενον in the first column, Mark 7:18, plus at the bottom of the first column εκπορευομενον, Mark 7:20): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=31047&pageID=1210&fullPage=true
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:26
Answer
1/1/24 2:17 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:26
Segment 12 - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited under reading (a), whereas manuscript image shows it should be under (ao2). Transcription requires updating (Column 2, line 25): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1350&fullPage=true
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 7:36
Answer
1/1/24 3:18 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 7:36
Segment 12 - Min . 124 is cited as it's own reading of (?), however this is due to the transcription incorrectly having both λεγωσιν and ειπωσιν together, whereas manuscript just has ειπωσιν, hence Min. 124 should be under (b) and not on its own: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1360&fullPage=true. Error present in print edition, page 339.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:1
Answer
1/1/24 6:35 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 8:1
Segment 30-32 - Min. 124 is cited under reading (d), when it should be with those under reading (b), as it includes ο Ι(ησου)ς. Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1370&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 6). Error present in print edition, page 343.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:3
Answer
1/1/24 6:47 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 8:3
Segment 14 - Min. 983 is cited under reading (a), whereas is should be under reading (c) as it includes τον (manuscript image is very faint, but the word is there): https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30983&pageID=1430&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 8).
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:6
Answer
1/1/24 7:06 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 8:6
Segment 42-52 - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited under reading (a), whereas it should be under reading (b) as it has παραθῶσι: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1370&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 4). Error present in print edition, page 351.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:16
Answer
1/1/24 7:39 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 8:16
Segment 9 - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited as its own reading (c), whereas manuscript shows it has reading (b), λέγοντες. Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1380&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 16). Print edition p. 361.

Segment 16 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a), whereas it should be under reading (b). Same as above, but line 17.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:23
Answer
1/3/24 6:37 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 8:23
Segment 36 - Min. 124 is incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should be under (c) as the manuscript has και επιθεις. Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1380&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 22). Print edition p. 370.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark)
Answer
1/3/24 1:37 AM as a reply to S Walch.

It is shocking to see how many errors there may be in a brand new scholarly eddition of the a NT book!

Thanks so much for sharing these.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM (Gos. of Mark) | Mark 8:28
Answer
1/3/24 9:24 PM as a reply to Manuscript Reader.

There's a few, sure, but nothing that personally causes me alarm. Thankfully the INTF is a collborative effort, hence it's good we are able to provide corrections on such an open platform. :)

Mark 8:28
Segment 26-32 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (i) when it should be with the other fam. 13 members under (g). Transcription on INTF requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1390&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 23). Print edition p. 378.

+1 (1 Vote)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 8:29
Answer
1/4/24 6:48 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 8:29
Segment 22 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a), when it should be under (b). Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1390&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 27). Print edition p. 378-79.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:4
Answer
1/6/24 9:48 AM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:4
Segment 10-12 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under (a), when it should come under (ao2). Transcription on INTF requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1400&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 22). Print edition p. 395.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:10
Answer
1/6/24 10:12 AM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:10
Segment 20-26 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited as having its own reading (d), when it actually has reading (c). Transcription on INTF requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1410&fullPage=true (Column 1, line 24). Print edition p. 403.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:22
Answer
1/7/24 5:31 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:22
Segment 6-12 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (g) when it should be under (d). Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1420&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 2). Print edition p. 417.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:25
Answer
1/7/24 5:33 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:25
Segment 42-44 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited as under its own reading (c), when it should be under reading (b). Transcription requires updating: https://ntvmr.uni-muenster.de/manuscript-workspace?a=1&docID=30124&pageID=1420&fullPage=true (Column 2, line 21). Print edition p. 420.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:39
Answer
1/10/24 1:44 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 9:39
All Segments - Min. 124 for some reason is consistently cited as if it doesn't contain the text of Mark 9:39 at all, only appearing along with the other witnesses under —, which is usually for those witnesses "which cannot be related at all... either because of a lacuna or because they are partially or completely illegible." As the transcription of Min. 124 shows, Min. 124 has Mark 9:39 in its entirety without any variant from the majority text (except of course moveable nu and iota adscript). Error present in print edition, pp. 436-437.

Mark 9:40
Similar is true for Mark 9:40, with Min. 124 appearing under — for no particular reason (and agrees with majority text). This in fact continues through Mark 9:41 and through to the end of Mark 9:50. Error present in print edition pp. 438-450.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:41
Answer
1/9/24 7:33 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:41
Segment 32 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should come under reading (b). No error present in Min. 124 transcription. Print edition p. 439.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:42
Answer
1/9/24 7:37 PM as a reply to S Walch.

Mark 9:42
Segment 2-6 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should be under reading (ao). No error in transcription. Print edition p. 440.

Segment 38-40 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should be under reading (b). No error in transcription. Print edition p. 441.

0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:43
Answer
1/9/24 7:41 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:43
Segment 22-34 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should come under reading (i). No error in transcription. Print edition p. 442.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 9:50
Answer
1/9/24 7:52 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 9:50
Segment 34 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (a) when it should be under reading (ao). No error in transcription. Print edition p. 450.
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 10:3
Answer
1/10/24 8:21 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 10:3
Segment 18 - Codex Cyprius (K / 017) should be cited under reading (a). 
0 (0 Votes)

RE: Corrections for ECM | Mark 10:12
Answer
1/10/24 9:10 PM as a reply to S Walch.
Mark 10:12
Segment 4-18 - Min. 124 incorrectly cited under reading (z) when it should be under (y). No error in transcription. Print edition p. 462.
0 (0 Votes)