It seems to have been relegated to the — section under variant unit 29:

As highlighted above in bold and red.

It makes sense that 05 appears there: since 05 does not have και γυνη ονοματι δαμαρις at all, it does not help in deciding whether there should be τιμια or αυτω inserted after γυνη. I still think that the ECM needs to make it more obvious that 05 is omitting the whole phrase.
25 a om.
b ευσχημων 05
26-32 a και γυνη ονοματι δαμαρις
b om. 05
Or one could try the solution of NA28 and say that ευσχημων (05) is one variant of καὶ γυνὴ ὀνόματι Δάμαρις, the others being και γυνη τιμια ονοματι Δαμαρις and και γυνη αυτω ονοματι Δαμαρις. This would look something like:
26-32 a και γυνη ονοματι δαμαρις
b και γυνη αυτω ονοματι δαμαρις
c και γυνη τιμια ονοματι δαμαρις
d ευσχημων 05

In ECM Acts, this variant is mentioned, but it is found in the Supplementary Volume, page 17 (see image below). It is an omission due to homoeoteleuton (H), so it is not mentioned in the apparatus (except that 05 is found in the lacuna list). The same is done in ECM Mark, e.g. 33 at Mk 3:24/18-25/16.