Comments and Suggestions for Corrections

 

We welcome your feedback of any noticed deficiencies found in the printed NA28.  Please restrict these comments to typos, errors in the front and back matter, and in rendering the evidence in the apparatus.  Thank you for your feedback.

You will need "Expert User" access to leave comments below.  To request "Expert User" access, please send an email to: expertaccess@uni-muenster.de

Message Boards (NA28) Message Boards (NA28)

Apparatus

RE: John 1:34

Threads [ Previous | Next ]
RSS (Opens New Window)
Toggle
John 1:34
Answer
01/03/17 10:57
This is a report that ff2c  is wrongly cited in NA28 (it is cited in support of electus filius but in the digital VL of John it is filius). Hugh Houghton confirms that electus is clearly deleted by an underline (see image attached).

Attachments:

Attachment

+1 (1 Vote)
Flag

RE: John 1:34
Answer
06/03/17 10:00 as a reply to Tommy Wasserman.
Dear Tommy,
Thank you for pointing this out!  You (and Hugh) are right.  It looks like a (Beuron 3) is also cited incorrectly in this unit (it does not need parentheses).  These corrections will be carried out in the next printing of the NA28.
+1 (1 Vote)
Flag

RE: John 1:34
Answer
06/03/17 10:05 as a reply to Greg Paulson.
Yes Greg, I have noted that a should not be cited in parenthesis here.

Further, I have changed my mind concerning P5 which in the IGNTP transcription is reconstructed as eklekto]s. I now think it is too ambiguous to be cited (the unabbreviated hyios fits the space better).
+1 (1 Vote)
Flag

Wiki Wiki

FrontPage

Details Print

INTF Wiki

0 Attachments
1113761 Views
Average (0 Votes)
Comments
Add Comment
xe ba gac
zxczdsaf
0 (0 Votes)
Posted on 06/08/24 05:32.