Posting is reserved for Verified Users.  To become a Verified User, send an email to: expertaccess@ntvmr.uni-muenster.de
Page 130 (folio 7r)

10047 (P47) Page 130 (folio 7r): The penultimate line & the LEX YOUTIE?

Threads [ Previous | Next ]

Jump To Artifact

I'm wondering why the transcription includes the negative ουκ within the reconstruction of the missing text. Since the scribe earlier writes μη (cf. Royse, Big Book, 388) and since the lines vary in length throughout the papyrus (and throughout the pages), why postulate an unnecessary additional scribal error? As if there weren't enough of them in this MS! :) 

 

 

0 (0 Votes)